Strauss Kahn case

I think that it is not fair for the media to form a premature opinion about Strauss Kahn’s innocence. This was because there was no solid evidence to prove that he was guilty. Furthermore, we should also give him a chance to turn over a new leaf, and there’s also conflicting evidence.

First of all, we do not have solid evidence of Strauss Kahn’s crime, therefore it would be wrong to even accuse him in the first place, as it would give people the impression and image that he was guilty, and no matter how he explained himself afterwards, nobody would trust him anymore. Thus, the accusation could lead to Strauss Kahn’s doom, and should be considered before accusing him.

Secondly, there’s also some conflicting evidence recently that prove that the prosecutor might not be entirely truthful. Thus, it showed that Strauss Kahn might be innocent, and not as guilty as what everyone accused in the first place. However, as I stated in the first point, people might already have a bad impression on him since everyone accused him, and it’s very hard to lift off that image, even if he’s proved innocent. Thus, it was not fair for the media to accuse him immediately.

Lastly, we should give Strauss Kahn a chance to turn over a new leaf and explain himself. He might have his own reasons, and not comfortable of saying, thus we should always see two sides of a story, and look at it at a different point of perspective, before accusing him guilty.